Teamwork.com

Teamwork.com is project management software for teams coordinating projects, time, and outside collaborators. It is best suited to small teams that can start within a defined free-plan cap or larger organizations that need substantially more project and automation capacity. Its tier structure is clear; custom pricing on every paid plan makes the cost harder to assess.

Overview

Teamwork.com combines project management with time tracking, guest access, and automation rules. That mix can suit teams managing client or cross-functional work, particularly when collaborators need access beyond the core group. The free plan provides a bounded way to start, but its five-project and five-user limits make it a poor fit for a growing team that needs room to expand without changing plans.

Paid tiers offer progressively larger project and automation allowances, with storage limits stated for the first four paid plans. The capacity ladder helps teams identify which tier accommodates their workload, but minimum seats apply to the first two paid tiers, and custom pricing makes cost comparisons difficult.

Key features

Project and automation limits

Free includes five projects and 100 automations. That is a defined starting point for a small group, not an open-ended workspace. Basics raises the allowances to 300 projects and 5,000 automations; Accelerate doubles those figures to 600 projects and 20,000 automations. Optimize and Enterprise both allow unlimited projects and 100,000 automations. The bigger quotas suit teams handling a broad portfolio or many automated processes, though the stated limits alone do not show which tier offers the best fit beyond capacity.

Time tracking and guest access

Time tracking and guest access make Teamwork.com relevant to teams that need to account for time and coordinate with external participants. Native integrations number 150, giving teams a substantial set of built-in connections to consider. The available feature details do not describe how those tools work, so buyers should weigh them as part of the product's stated scope rather than assume particular workflows.

Pricing

Teamwork.com uses a freemium model, with a free plan and a 14-day trial. The Free plan costs nothing, billed yearly, and includes five projects, five users, and 100 automations. Its hard caps make it suitable for a small team evaluating the platform or managing a limited workload, but teams that outgrow either the project or user allowance will need to move up.

• Basics: Custom pricing; 300 projects, 100 GB of storage, 5,000 automations, and a minimum of three users. It raises capacity substantially over Free, but the seat minimum may not suit a solo user or a pair.
• Accelerate: Custom pricing; 600 projects, 250 GB of storage, 20,000 automations, and a minimum of five users. Its larger quotas are aimed at bigger teams, while the minimum seat count makes it a less natural step for a small group.
• Optimize: Custom pricing; unlimited projects, 500 GB of storage, and 100,000 automations. It removes the project ceiling and provides more storage than Accelerate.
• Enterprise: Custom pricing; unlimited projects, 1,000 GB of storage, and 100,000 automations. The stated distinction from Optimize is a larger storage allowance.

Paid-plan pricing is custom, so teams cannot compare subscription costs from the plan figures alone. The 14-day trial offers a time-limited way to evaluate the service, but the stated terms do not establish renewal or billing details for paid subscriptions.

Platforms

Teamwork.com supports web, Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android. That breadth suits teams working across desktop and mobile devices rather than a single operating system.

Who it's for

Choose Teamwork.com if your team needs project capacity that can scale across defined tiers, along with time tracking, guest access, and automation. Free is the clearest fit for up to five users handling no more than five projects. Larger teams should compare their expected project, storage, and automation needs against paid-tier limits and account for the user minimums on Basics and Accelerate.

It is less compelling for buyers who need transparent paid pricing to compare options before making contact, or for very small teams that would be pushed above their needs by a paid tier's minimum seats.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Free includes five users, five projects, and 100 automations, giving small teams a concrete no-cost starting point.
• Pros: Higher tiers scale to unlimited projects and up to 1,000 GB of storage, which can accommodate larger portfolios.
• Pros: Time tracking, guest access, and 150 native integrations broaden its usefulness for teams coordinating work across people and tools.
• Cons: Paid plans use custom pricing, making it difficult to judge cost against the expanded quotas before requesting a price.
• Cons: Basics requires at least three users and Accelerate at least five, limiting their fit for smaller groups.
• Cons: Free is capped at five projects and five users, so a team that grows beyond either limit must consider a paid tier.

Alternatives

Pick Avaza if you want a free plan with unlimited project collaborators; its free tier instead limits users for timesheets and expenses, administration, resource scheduling, and team chat. Consider Deltek Maconomy if you need an enterprise ERP for a professional services firm and are comfortable with pricing by demo request.

Syncro Remote Access is a paid alternative with a stated Core Plan price of $129 a month billed annually, or $159 with monthly billing, and per-user pricing with unlimited endpoints. For storage-based billing, Datto Endpoint Backup for Windows uses consumption-based pricing; request a price from Datto.

Scoro is another paid option with a Time-billing plan at $17 a month, shown as €15 $17 £13 $24.5 $24 per user / month. Choose Acumatica Professional Services Edition if you prefer custom pricing based on applications, usage, resource needs, and deployment preferences. Monograph is another paid alternative, and Promys Enterprise PSA is an enterprise PSA option.

Browse Professional Services Automation Software or IT Project Management Software for category comparisons. The Time and Expense Software, AI Project Management Software, Game Project Management Software, and Work Management Software lists provide other category starting points.

Verdict

Teamwork.com is a good fit for teams that want defined capacity tiers, broad platform support, and project work joined by time tracking and guest access. Its free plan gives small teams a measurable place to start, while larger tiers accommodate far more projects and automation. Look elsewhere if confirmed paid-plan pricing is essential to evaluating your options, or if the free caps and paid seat minimums do not match your team.