Conviso Platform

Conviso Platform is an application security management service for teams coordinating assets, vulnerabilities, and testing across development work. It is best suited to organizations that need a shared view of AppSec risk across repositories; smaller teams can start free, while the paid plan requires a 12-month commitment.

Overview

Conviso brings application context to security findings by organizing assets, consolidating vulnerabilities, and linking architectural threats with test and scan results. Remediation workflows, finding correlation, ownership mapping, risk prioritization, and SBOM management make it a fit for teams trying to run a coordinated security program rather than handle each finding in isolation.

The cloud-only deployment rules it out for organizations that require self-hosting. Conviso says it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000. Founded in 2008 and headquartered in Curitiba, Brazil, it serves organizations from startups to large corporations.

Key features

Testing and risk context

The platform’s testing scope includes SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and container testing. Bringing those findings together with assets and architectural threats can help teams prioritize remediation with more context. That breadth is useful for programs spanning several testing methods, though teams should check that the plan and developer-counting rules fit their repositories before committing.

Development workflow and integrations

Integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Jira, Slack, Snyk, Semgrep, ServiceNow, and Microsoft Teams. These connections suit teams that want AppSec work to sit alongside source control, testing, issue tracking, and collaboration. Developers plan users also get AppSec Agent AI, described as providing diagnostics, fixes, and support during the development cycle; that capability is reserved for the paid tier.

API and security

The GraphQL API supports queries and mutations for projects, vulnerabilities, and scans, with a documented limit of 1,200 requests per minute. This gives teams a defined route for working with platform data programmatically. Conviso also says it is certified in ISO 27001 and ISO 20000.

Pricing

The Free plan costs nothing and allows up to 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, 10 users, and 2 integrations. Its 48-hour SLA and tight asset and integration caps make it most appropriate for a small team assessing the platform or coordinating a limited portfolio. The free allowance is not a broad-scale substitute for the paid tier.

Developers costs $19 a month, billed $2,040 charged per year, and starts at U$19 per contributing developer per month. It includes unlimited assets, users, and integrations, plus AppSec Agent AI, but has a 12-month minimum contract. Contributing developers are counted by commits to associated repositories in the preceding 30 days, so the billable headcount can reflect recent repository activity. Monthly or annual payment is available, with a stated 20% discount for annual payments; the plan lists a 24-hour SLA. The annual charge and minimum term make this a considered commitment even for teams drawn in by the per-developer monthly rate.

Platforms

Conviso Platform is available through web and API access. It is cloud-based and has no on-premises deployment option, which limits its fit for teams with a self-hosting requirement.

Who it's for

Conviso is strongest for organizations that need to connect assets, testing results, architectural threats, and remediation ownership across development teams. The free tier can accommodate a small footprint, while the Developers plan’s unlimited assets, users, and integrations better suits a growing program that can accept a year-long contract. Teams needing self-hosting, or unable to predict contributing-developer counts from recent commits, should look elsewhere.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Testing spans SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, and containers, with asset and threat context to help teams prioritize remediation.
• Pros: The Developers plan removes asset, user, and integration caps, and includes AppSec Agent AI for development-cycle diagnostics and fixes.
• Pros: GraphQL access covers projects, vulnerabilities, and scans, with a defined 1,200-request-per-minute limit.
• Cons: The Free plan is capped at 5 contributing developers, 5 assets, and 2 integrations, so larger programs will outgrow it.
• Cons: Developers requires a 12-month minimum, and contributing developers are counted using commits from the prior 30 days.
• Cons: Cloud-only deployment excludes organizations that require an on-premises option.

Alternatives

For a distinct access-security product, consider Ivanti Neurons for Zero Trust Access, which uses named-user licensing and SaaS delivery.

Choose OWASP DefectDojo if an open-source community edition with support through OWASP Slack and GitHub better suits your team.

Phoenix Security offers a free plan for up to 1,000 assets, with 2 premium users plus guests and dashboard reporting.

SecurStack is a smaller-scale option with a free allowance of 500 scan credits per month, 3 users, and 10 projects, including SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning.

Strobes ASPM provides a free plan capped at 100 assets and 500 tasks per month, with ASM, RBVM, ASPM, and one connector.

Arnica Secrets Security may suit teams seeking a free per-identity plan that includes weekly reports, several code and infrastructure scans, secrets scanning, and SSO.

OX Security is a paid alternative with plans covering code, dependency, secrets, SBOM, infrastructure, pipeline, container, IDE, and CLI capabilities.

Foxnode ASPM is another free ASPM option.

Conviso also belongs in comparisons of Application Security Posture Management Software and Application Security Orchestration Platforms.

Verdict

Choose Conviso Platform if your organization needs application security findings tied to assets, architectural threats, ownership, and remediation, and can work in a cloud service. Its breadth of testing and uncapped paid-tier assets, users, and integrations give a growing AppSec program room to coordinate work. Look elsewhere if self-hosting is mandatory or a 12-month contract and commit-based developer counting do not fit your budget planning.