ScanDog

ScanDog is a cloud application-security posture management service that unifies findings from many scanning methods and turns them into prioritized work. It suits developers and security teams responsible for several products, especially those that need risk context rather than separate alert queues. Its broad coverage and workflow tooling are compelling, but the smaller plans impose firm limits on products, workflows, users, and AI fixes.

Overview

ScanDog covers static analysis (SAST), software-composition analysis (SCA), dynamic testing (DAST), infrastructure-as-code, secrets, containers, and software-bill-of-materials (SBOM) management. Finding deduplication helps reduce repeated alerts, while policy gates, ticketing synchronization, and remediation workflows connect detection with the work of fixing it.

Prioritization uses EPSS, KEV status, exploitability, reachability, and business impact. That combination is more useful than severity alone: a theoretically serious issue with no reachable path can fall behind an exploitable, business-critical finding. Teams still need to set appropriate business context, but the signals provide a stronger basis for triage.

ScanDog is cloud-based and lists Berlin, Germany as its location. Exportable audit reports, compliance mapping, and a GDPR-compliant badge support organizations that need security activity documented for audits.

Key features

• One view across scanners: Integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jira, Linear, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Snyk, Semgrep, Trivy, and OWASP ZAP. This breadth can consolidate an existing toolchain instead of forcing a single scanner choice.
• Risk-aware triage: EPSS, KEV, exploitability, reachability, and business impact make prioritization AI-assisted and context-sensitive. It is most valuable where alert volume makes severity-only queues impractical.
• Remediation workflows: Deduplication, policy gates, ticketing sync, and workflow support help move findings into ownership and follow-up rather than leaving them in a dashboard.
• AI fixes with a stated boundary: AI remediation proposes minimal diffs and safe refactors intended to preserve behavior and tests. ScanDog says it receives only narrow issue snippets, never the full codebase, when AI is used. The approach may reassure teams cautious about code exposure, although the monthly fix quotas constrain heavy use.
• Notification gap: Google Chat notifications for pull requests and findings are coming soon, so organizations that depend on Google Chat cannot treat it as a current integration.

Pricing

ScanDog uses a freemium model. The Free plan costs 0.00 EUR and includes three products, 10 workflows, two users, and 30 AI fixes per month, with email support. It is aimed at individual developers, security enthusiasts, and IT professionals. Those caps make it a sensible evaluation or small-project tier, but not a broad multi-team rollout.

Team costs €19 per user per month, billed annually. It raises capacity to up to 10 products, 200 workflows, up to 30 users, and 200 AI fixes per month, with email support. Growing security teams in mid-sized organizations get substantially more room for shared processes, though annual billing and per-user pricing matter as membership expands.

Enterprise has custom pricing and removes the published ceilings: unlimited products, workflows, users, and AI fixes per month, with dedicated support. It is the appropriate route for larger programs, but buyers must contact ScanDog to establish cost and terms.

Platforms

ScanDog is delivered through a web interface and API. Its cloud deployment favors centralized teams and integrations rather than an on-device or self-hosted operating model.

Who it's for

Choose ScanDog when one security program spans code, dependencies, live applications, infrastructure, secrets, containers, and SBOMs, and needs risk-based queues plus ticketing and policy controls. Free fits a small individual or pilot deployment; Team fits a growing security group coordinating multiple products. Organizations requiring self-hosting, Google Chat today, or predictable Enterprise pricing should consider other options.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad coverage: Seven major scanning and inventory areas reduce the need to manage disconnected security views.
• Useful prioritization signals: Reachability, exploitation indicators, and business impact can focus limited remediation capacity.
• Workflow integration: Policy gates, deduplication, ticketing, and collaboration integrations support operational follow-through.
• Bounded AI input: Narrow snippets rather than the full codebase is a clear data-handling boundary for AI-assisted fixes.

Cons

• Strict Free limits: Three products, 10 workflows, two users, and 30 AI fixes monthly leave little headroom beyond a small deployment.
• Annual Team billing: The €19 per-user monthly rate is tied to annual billing, which reduces flexibility for short commitments.
• Google Chat is not ready: Notifications remain forthcoming, excluding a required channel for now.
• Enterprise requires contact: No published Enterprise price makes budgeting harder for larger buyers.

Alternatives

ArcherySec is the better choice for teams wanting a free, GPL-3.0-licensed, self-hosted deployment across API, web, and desktop/server platforms.

OWASP DefectDojo suits organizations seeking an open-source community edition with free-forever terms and support through OWASP Slack and GitHub.

Conviso Platform is worth considering when a free tier capped at five contributing developers, five assets, 10 users, and two integrations matches the rollout.

Strobes ASPM fits teams that prefer a free plan for up to 100 assets and 500 tasks per month, with ASM, RBVM, ASPM, and one connector.

Harness Security Testing Orchestration is a web-based paid option with Harness Open Source, Litmus Chaos, and community support in its free plan.

OX Security is a paid alternative offering SAST, SCA, secrets/PII, SBOM, IaC, CI/CD, container scanning, and IDE and CLI coverage.

Vulnetix Resolve is a paid option for teams needing Linux, macOS, Windows, and web support.

PointGuard AI is another paid, web-based alternative.

Verdict

ScanDog is a strong fit for developers and security teams that want one cloud workflow for diverse application-security findings, with prioritization grounded in exploitability, reachability, and business impact. Its main reason to choose it is the combination of broad scanner coverage, workflow controls, and bounded AI remediation. Look elsewhere if your deployment needs self-hosting, Google Chat notifications immediately, or a firm Enterprise price before a sales conversation.