EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

ArcherySec vs Conviso Platform

ArcherySec logo

ArcherySec

6.7#5 in application security orchestration platformsFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit
Conviso Platform logo

Conviso Platform

7.3#4 in application security orchestration platformsFrom $19 a month
Free planWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactArcherySecConviso Platform
APIThe documentation describes REST APIs for scanning and vulnerability management.Conviso exposes a GraphQL API with queries and mutations for projects, scans and vulnerabilities, authenticated by API keys and limited to 1,200 requests per minute.
DeploymentThe project README documents Linux and Windows installation, Docker images, Docker Compose, and AWS serverless deployment using Zappa.Conviso Platform is cloud-based and does not offer an on-premises deployment option.
Founded2017LinkedIn lists the company as founded in 2008.
HeadquartersIndiaCuritiba, Brazil
IntegrationsDocumented connectors include OWASP ZAP, Burp, Arachni, OpenVAS, Jira, and email.Listed integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Jira, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Snyk, Checkmarx, ServiceNow, Semgrep, SonarQube, Veracode, Power BI and others.
PurposeArcherySec is an open-source vulnerability assessment and management tool for developers and penetration testers.Conviso Platform centralizes application security context and vulnerabilities to help organizations operate AppSec programs at scale.
SupportThe Jira connector documentation directs users with questions to [email protected] or to raise an issue.The pricing comparison lists a 48-hour SLA for Free and a 24-hour SLA for Developers.

ArcherySec plans

  • Open sourceFree

Conviso Platform plans

  • FreeFree
  • Developers$19 a month

Pick ArcherySec if…

It is intended for developers, penetration testers and DevOps teams managing vulnerabilities. It may suit teams that can run supported scanners and deploy and operate a self-hosted tool.

Pick Conviso Platform if…

It suits organizations from startups to large corporations that need to organize application security findings and workflows. Teams should account for its cloud-only deployment and developer-based plan limits.

Charts they share