MedHub

MedHub is a medical education management platform for undergraduate medical education and graduate residency programs. It is best suited to institutions that need curriculum and assessment alongside residency administration, rather than a standalone scheduling tool. Its breadth is compelling for that institutional remit, but custom pricing and GME-office-managed API access make it a coordinated purchase.

Overview

MedHub spans student and schedule management for undergraduate programs and the operational demands of graduate medical education. Its combination of curriculum mapping, assessment, resident onboarding, accreditation management, and reimbursement optimization can consolidate work across education programs. That breadth is most useful to institutions seeking a shared platform; organizations needing only a narrow scheduling function may find the scope harder to justify.

Key features

UME and GME administration

UME tools cover curriculum mapping, competency tracking, evaluations, accreditation maintenance, reporting, and scheduling. GME adds residency and call scheduling, evaluations, onboarding, accreditation management, and reimbursement optimization. Conflict checks support scheduling workflows. Together, these capabilities address more than rota creation, though institutions should weigh that range against their actual needs.

Curriculum, assessment, and mobile work

MedHub’s curriculum and assessment solution includes board exam readiness tools, performance analytics, and AI risk assessment. The mobile app supports evaluations, work hours, calendars, procedure logs, reminders, talk-to-text, and offline task syncing. Offline syncing and reminders are practical advantages for residents working away from a desk; app functionality also makes the platform more than a browser-based administrative system.

Connections, access, and reliability

Interfaces include AAMC ERAS, ACGME, NPDB, NPPES, PeopleSoft, Epic, Oracle, Comet LMS, Qgenda, and Kronos. SAML and Shibboleth single sign-on are supported. The API uses predefined calls, with access managed through an institution’s GME office—a fit for centrally governed deployments, but a coordination step for teams seeking direct integration access.

MedHub states that it uses 128-bit SSL encryption, offers multifactor authentication, and is FERPA- and SOC 2-compliant. Its security summary describes encrypted client-data transfers, daily incremental backups, weekly full backups, and a documented continuity plan. The company states 99.95% uptime across 24/7/365 operations. Live and on-demand training, a Learning Portal, and strategic advisory services support institutional rollout.

Pricing

MedHub uses a paid, custom-pricing model; institutions are invited to request a demo and pricing. There are no public plan tiers or seat limits to compare, so it is not a self-serve purchase with a visible entry price. Institutions should involve their GME office early, particularly if API access is part of the deployment.

Platforms

MedHub supports web, Android, iOS, and API access. The mobile apps are distributed through the Apple App Store and Google Play. Rotation scheduling, call scheduling, conflict checks, and mobile access are supported.

Who it's for

MedHub is a strong candidate for medical schools and residency institutions that want curriculum, assessment, accreditation, evaluations, and scheduling in one system, with established interfaces and institutional controls. It is less suited to a small team seeking a low-friction scheduling-only tool or transparent pricing before contacting sales.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad education coverage: UME curriculum and competency tools sit alongside GME onboarding, accreditation, evaluations, and scheduling.
• Useful mobile workflows: Work hours, procedure logs, reminders, talk-to-text, and offline task syncing support resident tasks beyond the desktop.
• Institutional connectivity: A wide set of named interfaces, SSO support, and a predefined-call API accommodate connected deployments.
• Operational safeguards: The stated compliance, backup, continuity, and uptime provisions address institutional reliability concerns.

Cons

• Custom pricing: Institutions must request pricing, making budget comparison less direct.
• API access requires institutional coordination: Requests go through the GME office, which may slow teams that need to arrange integrations.
• Potentially more platform than needed: Its breadth is a weaker fit when the requirement is only residency scheduling.

Alternatives

Compare medical residency scheduling software if you want to assess the category before choosing a platform.

Amion is worth considering for programs that prioritize self-serve setup and mobile and desktop access; its Pro plan supports up to 10 schedules, while Enterprise supports unlimited schedules.

Aurora-Med is another paid option, with Linux, macOS, Windows, web, and self-hosted platforms.

Lightning Bolt may suit organizations evaluating per-seat clinical team scheduling; additional licenses are required when the number of scheduled individuals grows.

TigerConnect Physician Scheduling is an alternative with enterprise-wide pricing and sales-led demos.

New Innovations, Medtrics, and MyEvaluations are other paid, web-based options; MyEvaluations has no free plan.

CallGrid is a web-based scheduling alternative with a free trial and a listed price of $125 a month, billed monthly based on active resident count; a $25/month minimum covers up to 25 residents, and each program is billed separately.

Verdict

Choose MedHub if your institution needs one platform for medical education administration across UME and GME, especially when mobile resident workflows and institutional integrations matter. Its main case against itself is practical: custom pricing and GME-office-controlled API access call for institutional coordination, while narrower scheduling needs may be better served by a more focused alternative.