Berlvis Credentials

Berlvis Credentials is a browser-based batch generator for ID cards and certificates, built around spreadsheet-driven recipient data. It fits HR departments, schools, training providers, and event teams that need print-ready credentials in volume. The monthly ID-card tier is the sensible entry point; certificate production and bulk QR signing sit behind the annual All Access plan.

Overview

Import an Excel or CSV file, map its columns to template fields, and generate a complete batch. This approach is well suited to recurring issuances where names, photos, and other recipient fields already live in a spreadsheet. It is less compelling for one-off visual design work or workflows centered on independently verifiable digital credentials.

Studio includes CR80 card presets and A4 certificate layouts. Exports include 300 DPI PDF print sheets and PNG files, giving print shops and internal teams usable output formats. Template definitions are stored in the cloud, while uploaded photos and spreadsheets remain on the user's machine and are not persisted, a useful distinction for organizations handling sensitive recipient files.

Runs above a few thousand rows should be divided into batches of 2,000–3,000 to keep browser memory predictable. That is a workable operating rule for sizable school or event lists, but it means very large issuances require several passes rather than one unrestricted job. Berlvis Credentials is in beta, so teams choosing a core production workflow should allow for that maturity level.

Key features

Spreadsheet-to-template generation

Column mapping turns structured Excel or CSV data into repeated card or certificate fields. Bulk generation reduces manual copying and is the product's strongest reason to choose it over a general design tool.

Card and certificate output

CR80 presets target standard ID-card dimensions, while A4 layouts address certificates. High-resolution PDF sheets are appropriate for print runs, and PNG exports cover image-based delivery.

QR and payment support

QR codes can be tied to recipient records, with bulk QR signing on paid plans. However, independent verification is not generally available and the beta is focused on bulk issuance, so QR functionality should not be treated as a complete public validation system. Paystack supports local card payments and Stripe supports international card payments.

Pricing

The Free plan costs nothing and includes Studio access with watermarked exports. It is useful for evaluating the workflow or producing internal drafts, but the watermark rules it out for polished issued credentials.

ID Cards costs 5,000 NGN a month, billed ₦5,000/ month. It adds unlimited ID card templates and generation, bulk Excel import, PDF and print sheets, and removes the watermark. This is the clearest fit for teams producing cards regularly without needing certificate batches or QR signing.

All Access costs 50,000 NGN a year, billed ₦50,000/ year. It includes everything in ID Cards plus unlimited certificates, bulk QR signing, brand kits, team templates, and priority support. Choose it when certificates and shared branding are central; otherwise the annual commitment buys capabilities an ID-card-only operation may not use.

Platforms

Berlvis Credentials runs on the web, so teams can use it without a native desktop installation. The browser-based workflow also explains why splitting very large jobs helps keep memory use predictable.

Who it's for

HR teams issuing employee cards, schools and training programs producing class or completion credentials, and event organizers with repeat attendee lists are the natural audience. It also suits teams that already maintain recipient data in spreadsheets and need print-ready files quickly. Look elsewhere if third-party verification is a requirement, if you need a mature non-beta platform, or if your normal runs far exceed a few thousand rows.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Excel and CSV field mapping supports repeatable batch production instead of manual entry.
• CR80 cards, A4 certificates, 300 DPI PDFs, and PNG exports cover common physical-credential needs.
• Paid tiers remove the free watermark, while All Access adds brand kits, team templates, and priority support.
• Photos and spreadsheets are not persisted, although template definitions are cloud-saved.

Cons

• Independent QR verification is generally unavailable, limiting the value of QR codes for public validation.
• Large runs need 2,000–3,000-row batches to keep browser memory predictable.
• Certificate generation and bulk QR signing require the 50,000.00 NGN-per-year All Access tier.
• The product is in beta, which may concern teams seeking a settled production system.

Alternatives

MailMergic is a better fit when you need API, macOS, web, or Windows access and a yearly Pro plan with 1,000 documents per month; its free tier is limited to 25 documents monthly and carries watermarks.

DesignCap suits lighter, design-led projects on the web, with a free plan offering limited templates, five image uploads, five saved designs, and JPG exports.

EZdoc AI Certificate Maker is worth considering for API or web certificate work when a free allowance of 25 copies per month and CSV/XLSX upload is enough.

SimpleCert offers API and web access with 50 introductory credits on its free plan and a 19.00 USD monthly Basic tier.

SuTan Certificate Platform is a web alternative with a 499.00 INR monthly Starter plan, unlimited certificates, and team support for two members.

Certhive is a web e-certificate service with a free Starter tier capped at 50 certificates.

CertificatesMaker is the simpler choice if a free-forever web plan with no limitations is the priority.

Certifier fits API and web credential programs whose free Starter allowance is up to 250 credentials per year.

Browse more options in Certificate Maker Software.

Verdict

Choose Berlvis Credentials if your organization turns spreadsheet lists into batches of physical ID cards or certificates and wants print-ready exports with paid, watermark-free plans. The main reason to look elsewhere is the combination of beta status, browser-oriented batch limits, and the lack of generally available independent QR verification.