Elastic Observability vs OpenTelemetry eBPF Profiler
| Elastic Observability | OpenTelemetry eBPF Profiler | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Paid from | 99 /mo | — |
| Deployment | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Language support | PHP, Python, Java/JVM, Go, Rust, C/C++, Node.js/V8, Ruby, Perl, Zig | C/C++, Rust, Zig, Go, HotSpot JVM, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, V8, Perl, Erlang, .NET |
| Profiling types | CPU profiling through stack sampling | whole-system, cross-language, native code, system libraries, high-level language runtimes |
Both are listed in Best Continuous Profiling Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, Elastic Observability scores higher on our published basis.