Anti-Twin vs fclones
| Anti-Twin | fclones | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Platform coverage | cross-platform | cross-platform |
| Scan locations | local hard disks, USB flash disks, memory cards, shared network folders, second folder/path | Directory trees, multiple directory roots, standard-input file lists, and mounted or removable devices |
| Match methods | file names, byte-by-byte file content, binary similarity, pixel-based image comparison | File size, inode/file identifiers, prefix hash, suffix hash, and full-content hash |
| Automatic selection | Yes | Yes |
| Recycle Bin / Trash | Yes | — |
| File preview | — | Yes |
| Folder exclusions | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Duplicate File Finders. On Everything Xiaomi, fclones scores higher on our published basis.