WANNA

Overview

WANNA gives fashion brands and retailers AR try-on and interactive 3D product viewing for digital shopping. It suits luxury businesses that want branded app or web integrations, or a ready-made fitting room; its custom pricing makes it a less natural fit for smaller sellers seeking a self-serve subscription.

Brands can choose among SDK integrations, a browser-based viewer and a prebuilt fitting room. That range is useful when a business has a defined digital-commerce plan, but it also means choosing an implementation route and arranging a quote rather than simply signing up for a published plan.

Key features

Try-on and 3D viewing

WANNA supports try-on across footwear, bags, watches, jewellery, clothing and scarves, as well as homeware, premium spirits and perfumes. The 3D Viewer lets shoppers explore product models in a browser or mobile app. Video output and API access extend the possible integration options, while person-photo input means brands should consider the privacy implications of inviting shoppers to use personal imagery.

Models and integration

Brands can choose models from the WANNA Catalogue, upload their own through WANNA Studio or ask WANNA to create them. Apparel 3D content made with CLO and Browzwear is supported. Native and web SDKs come with technical documentation and expert support; the Virtual Fitting Room combines try-on and 3D viewing in a prebuilt interface accessed through a web link. That gives teams a choice between deeper integration and a ready-made experience.

Implementation estimates vary by route: the virtual try-on page gives 5–6 working days, the AR page estimates 2–3 working days for SDK integration, and the maker says its simplest web integration can take one day. These are distinct routes and estimates, not a single universal launch timeline. WANNA also says its experiences passed an external ADA-compliance audit and that controls can be enhanced by voice-over, a useful accessibility consideration for customer-facing shopping.

Privacy and stewardship

Subject to explicit consent, WANNA's policy says it may collect photos or videos, along with device, location, body-shape and biometric information. It says this data may support service delivery, customization, website operation and improvement, and usage analysis. Personal data is stored and processed on Amazon Web Services servers in Northern Virginia, USA; Amplitude is used to analyze website navigation and feature preferences. The policy lists pseudonymization and tokenization, encryption in transit and at rest, vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. These measures are relevant safeguards, but brands should still assess the data collection and US storage against their own privacy requirements.

Pricing

WANNA is paid, with custom pricing on request. It describes pricing as flexible, with an entry fee, no onboarding SKU charges and no additional-domain fees, but publishes no amounts. That may suit brands whose domain and product needs call for a tailored arrangement, but it prevents straightforward budget comparison before contacting the company. There are no published plan tiers, seat counts, usage quotas or trial terms to compare.

Platforms

WANNA offers a native iOS SDK and a Web SDK. Its Virtual Fitting Room works in Android and iOS mobile browsers and in desktop browsers; the 3D Viewer is available in browser or mobile app experiences. Brands choosing an SDK should match the integration route to their existing app or website, while the fitting room provides a browser-based alternative.

Who it's for

WANNA is aimed at luxury fashion brands and retailers building richer digital product experiences. Its catalogue and model-creation options may help teams without every 3D asset ready, while support for existing CLO and Browzwear apparel content can suit brands already producing those models. Gucci, Farfetch and GOAT are named as customers. Smaller merchants wanting a clearly priced, self-serve tool may prefer a product with published entry plans. WANNA says it was acquired by Perfect Corp. in 2025.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad product coverage: Try-on spans fashion items and adjacent categories such as homeware, spirits and perfumes.
• Multiple content routes: Brands can select, upload or commission 3D models, and apparel content from CLO and Browzwear is supported.
• Flexible deployment: SDKs, a browser-based viewer and a combined prebuilt fitting room serve different integration needs.
• Accessibility and security measures: WANNA describes an external ADA-compliance audit and lists technical safeguards including encryption and penetration testing.

Cons

• Opaque cost: Custom pricing and an entry fee make advance budgeting difficult, even though additional domains carry no fee.
• Privacy burden: Photo, body-shape and biometric data collection may require careful review by brands deploying shopper-facing try-on.
• Business-oriented setup: SDK integration and a tailored commercial arrangement are less suited to a small seller seeking an immediate, low-cost subscription.

Alternatives

Browse the AI Virtual Try-On Tools category to compare options. TryOn Virtual is worth considering when a free capped plan or a published $15 a month Essentials plan better fits a smaller budget. Fittingbox Virtual Try-On offers a published Bronze plan at $59 a month for teams that want priced entry rather than a quote. Tryonixs has a free plan and a $19 a month Starter plan for businesses comparing a lower-cost freemium route. DRESSX Virtual Try-On is another paid, custom-priced option for a tailored B2B solution. PICTOFiT is another paid option across Android, iOS and web. Style.me Virtual Fitting uses custom monthly pricing based on digitized-item quantity and traffic, which may suit businesses budgeting around those measures. FaceCake CAKE is another paid option across Android, iOS and web. TryOnCloud offers a trial and a Starter plan at $19 a month for businesses seeking a published monthly option.

Verdict

Choose WANNA if you are a fashion or luxury retailer seeking adaptable AR try-on and 3D shopping experiences, with options for custom models, SDK integration or a ready-made fitting room. Its range of integration and content routes is the strongest reason to consider it. Look elsewhere if published pricing and a simple self-serve start matter more, or if collecting shopper photos and biometric information is a poor fit for your privacy requirements.