AgileLaw

AgileLaw is litigation exhibit software for organizing and presenting evidence across depositions, trials, and other proceedings. It is best suited to legal teams that need shared, searchable exhibits and a Word-based citation workflow. Its broad file support and session-based entry option are useful, but monthly quotas and no offline access limit its appeal.

Overview

AgileLaw carries exhibits from witness preparation through depositions, briefing, trial, and arbitration. Full-text repository search and real-time sharing give teams a common way to find and present material. Exhibit management, annotation, and video playback cover central presentation tasks, though work depends on an online connection: offline access is not offered. Production & Review is marked “Coming Soon,” so it should not be part of a buying decision today.

Key features

Its file range is a practical strength: PDFs, TIFFs, images, Word and PowerPoint files, video, audio, and Excel files are supported, with spreadsheets viewable in a built-in viewer. Uploads can reach 1 GB. The Microsoft Word add-in generates exhibit citations, an index, and a cover sheet, and works with Word on Windows, Mac, and the web. Integrations with Relativity, Clio, Box, and Dropbox may help firms fit exhibit work into existing services.

AgileLaw says documents are encrypted at rest with AES-256 and in transit with TLS. Its security measures also include role-based permissions, audit trails, and logical isolation between firms' data; it reports SOC 2 Type II certification, HIPAA compliance, and GDPR readiness. Qualified prospects can review its current audit report under NDA.

Browser support includes Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge. The FAQ also identifies iPad, Android, Surface, and Kindle Fire tablets as supported without software installation. Support includes a self-serve knowledge base, recorded training, tutorials, and chat or email; Advantage and Enterprise add phone support.

Pricing

AgileLaw is paid, with no free plan, and offers a 14-day trial. The Advantage trial continues until the first hosted session, and a free credit covers one host session. That makes the trial relevant to teams evaluating Advantage, but it is not a substitute for an ongoing free tier.

• Starter — $195, paid once: $195 per host session, on-demand depositions, one monthly active host, 5 GB storage, and one active case. It avoids a recurring bill and suits occasional hosts, but the single-host, single-case, and storage limits constrain sustained team use.
• Essentials — $200 a month: five sessions a month, unlimited participants, 10 active cases, five monthly active hosts, and 50 GB storage. It fits a small team with regular proceedings; the session quota is the key trade-off.
• Advantage — $500 a month: ten sessions a month, unlimited participants, 30 active cases, 10 monthly active hosts, and 200 GB storage. The larger case, host, and storage allowances suit busier teams, but the higher recurring cost is hard to justify for occasional use.
• Enterprise — custom pricing: a custom package with custom storage and active cases and unlimited participants. It is the plan for firms whose needs exceed the fixed packages, though it requires a tailored quote.

Platforms

AgileLaw supports Android, iOS, macOS, web, and Windows. Its tablet support and browser access reduce installation needs on supported devices, but the absence of offline access remains a meaningful constraint for proceedings where connectivity is uncertain.

Who it's for

AgileLaw says it serves firms from solo attorneys to AmLaw 200 firms, as well as litigation teams handling proceedings. The per-session Starter plan is the clearest fit for sporadic deposition work; Essentials and Advantage make more sense when multiple hosts and active cases justify a monthly commitment. Firms that require offline presentation or Production & Review now should look elsewhere.

Pros and cons

• Pro: Search, real-time sharing, annotation, and video playback bring useful exhibit tasks together for teams presenting evidence.
• Pro: Broad file support, 1 GB uploads, and the Word add-in cover varied evidence and common citation materials.
• Pro: Multiple security controls and reported SOC 2 Type II certification provide concrete safeguards for sensitive case material.
• Con: There is no offline access, leaving teams dependent on connectivity during proceedings.
• Con: Fixed monthly plans cap sessions, hosts, cases, and storage; frequent users may need the more expensive Advantage tier or custom Enterprise pricing.
• Con: Production & Review is not yet available, so teams needing it immediately cannot rely on AgileLaw for that workflow.

Alternatives

For a broader comparison, see Legal Trial Presentation Software and Legal Deposition Software.

• Visiodocs is worth considering if a free reviewer plan matters: it includes 1 GB storage, 25 documents total, unlimited projects, review and annotation, and OCR.
• Lexel offers a free basic plan with one user, 3 TB storage, and support for files up to 100 GB; consider it if those limits and its iOS, web, or self-hosted platforms fit your needs.
• eTrialToolkit offers free licenses for judges and court registrars; its SaaS software and hosting plan has no data fees or surcharges.
• Exhibit Presenter Plus has a free demonstration version and a $99 one-time paid plan, making it an option for Windows users comparing a lower upfront price.
• LiveLitigation may suit teams that prioritize offline work: its Local Only plan is $399/year and includes unlimited local sessions, detailed usage reports, full offline access, and pay-as-you-go remote usage.
• Case Crafter is another paid option for readers comparing litigation presentation software.
• InTrial is another paid option for readers comparing litigation software across iOS, web, and Windows.
• LIT SUITE is another option for readers comparing litigation tools on iOS and macOS.

Verdict

AgileLaw is a strong fit for litigation teams that need searchable, shareable exhibits, varied file support, and a Word citation workflow across proceedings. Its strongest reason to choose it is the combination of evidence handling and collaborative presentation; its strongest reason to look elsewhere is the lack of offline access, compounded by capped monthly sessions and hosts. Choose Starter for occasional sessions, or a monthly tier when the included capacity matches your workload.