VisualSP
7.3#4 in digital adoption platformsFrom $547.83 a monthFree planWebExtension
VisitVisualSP vs Whatfix
What both publish
| Fact | VisualSP | Whatfix |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics | Usage reporting tracks engagement, adoption, saved time and support-cost effects; Clarity Connect 365 adds heatmaps and session recordings. | Product Analytics can track user actions and application adoption, and its Standard plan is included free with a DAP Web & Desktop plan. |
| Company legal name | The Chrome Web Store identifies the developer as Rehmani Consulting, Inc. | The Apple App Store identifies the developer as Whatfix Private Limited. |
| Headquarters | LinkedIn lists headquarters at 13400 S Route 59, Suite 116, Plainfield, Illinois, United States. | Bengaluru, India |
| Integrations | Supported applications include Microsoft 365, Dynamics 365, Copilot, Power Platform, Salesforce, HubSpot, Workday, ServiceNow, Jira, NetSuite, SAP, Zendesk, and Zoom. | Published integrations include Salesforce, Salesforce Survey, SAP SuccessFactors, ServiceNow, SurveyMonkey and Workday. |
| Rating on Chrome Web Store | 4.6 out of 5 from 14 ratings | 4.7 out of 5 from 21 ratings |
| Rating on G2 | 4.9 out of 5 from 34 reviews | 4.5 out of 5 from 559 reviews |
VisualSP plans
- Adopt365Free
- Standard$6,574 a year
- Enterprise$6,875 a year
- Platinum$15,345 a year
- Platinum—
- Clarity Connect 365—
Whatfix plans
- Product Analytics StandardFree
- DAP Web & Desktop PremiumPriced on request
- DAP Web & Desktop EnterprisePriced on request
- DAP Mobile StandardPriced on request
- StandardPriced on request
- PremiumPriced on request
Pick VisualSP if…
VisualSP suits organizations that want in-app guidance and support across browser-based business applications. Enterprise is described for teams focused on Microsoft applications, while Platinum is for teams using a mix of applications.
Pick Whatfix if…
Whatfix suits organizations seeking in-app guidance and adoption analytics across web, desktop, mobile, or virtual desktop environments. Its self-hosted option may suit organizations considering that deployment model, with some feature availability limits to note.