Secret Double Octopus vs WiKID
| Secret Double Octopus | WiKID | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Deployment | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Supported factors | mobile push; biometrics; FIDO2 security keys; X.509 smartcards; OTP; Apple Watch; BLE; Windows Hello | PIN and WiKID software token/device |
| App integration methods | SAML; OIDC; RADIUS; LDAP/LDAPS; FIDO2/WebAuthn; REST API | RADIUS, LDAP, TACACS+, SAML, native Active Directory, API/network clients |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Device trust controls | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Secret Double Octopus scores higher on our published basis.