EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

PgDoorman vs Supavisor

PgDoorman

5.9#14 in database proxy softwareFree plan
Free planLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
Visit

Supavisor

7.6#3 in database proxy softwareFrom $25 a month
Free planAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactPgDoormanSupavisor
AuthenticationDocumented authentication methods include MD5 or SCRAM passthrough, auth_query, PAM, JWT, Talos JWT, and pg_hba.conf access rules.Client credentials can be verified using tenant user records or an authentication query.
High availabilityPatroni-assisted fallback can direct new backend connections to another live cluster member when the local PostgreSQL server disappears during a switchover.Cluster nodes monitor tenant pools and reconnecting clients can start replacement pools after a node failure.

PgDoorman plans

  • PgDoormanFree

Supavisor plans

  • FreeFree
  • Open-source SupavisorFree
  • Pro$25 a month
  • Team$599 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick PgDoorman if…

PgDoorman suits teams that operate PostgreSQL themselves and need connection pooling, load balancing, or automatic failover. Its Linux or macOS and PostgreSQL version requirements matter when assessing a deployment.

Pick Supavisor if…

Supavisor suits teams operating PostgreSQL that need connection pooling across tenants or a single-tenant PgBouncer replacement. It is aimed at self-hosted deployments rather than serverless environments.

Charts they share