Peer Global File Service vs Triofox
| Peer Global File Service | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $11/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Windows | Android, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | SMB, NFS v3, NFS v4 | CIFS/SMB, HTTPS |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, NetApp StorageGRID, Nutanix Objects | Amazon S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, OpenStack, Wasabi, Microsoft SharePoint, WebDAV, Rackspace CloudFiles, Internap XipCloud |
| Edge synchronization | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Triofox scores higher on our published basis.