Peer Global File Service vs QNAP HybridMount
| Peer Global File Service | QNAP HybridMount | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | $1.67/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted, Windows | self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | — |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | SMB, NFS v3, NFS v4 | SMB, AFP, NFS, FTP, WebDAV |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, NetApp StorageGRID, Nutanix Objects | Object storage and file storage services, including S3-compatible and WebDAV-compatible storage |
| Edge synchronization | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Peer Global File Service scores higher on our published basis.