Panzura CloudFS vs Triofox
| Panzura CloudFS | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $11/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | Android, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | SMB, NFS, S3 | CIFS/SMB, HTTPS |
| Cloud storage targets | AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi, NetApp, Dell EMC ECS, Cloudian, Scality, MinIO, Oracle Cloud Storage | Amazon S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, OpenStack, Wasabi, Microsoft SharePoint, WebDAV, Rackspace CloudFiles, Internap XipCloud |
| Edge synchronization | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Triofox scores higher on our published basis.