NCover vs SimpleCov
| NCover | SimpleCov | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | extension, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Coverage types | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity | line, branch, method, oneshot-line, eval |
| Supported languages | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages | Ruby |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML | HTML, JSON |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | — |
| Historical trends | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, SimpleCov scores higher on our published basis.