NCover vs ReportGenerator
| NCover | ReportGenerator | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | extension, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Coverage types | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity | line, branch, method, full method, MC/DC |
| Supported languages | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages | .NET, Java, Node.js |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML | HTML, Clover, Cobertura, OpenCover, SonarQube, TeamCity, lcov, XML, JSON, LaTeX, text, CSV, Markdown, SVG, badges |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | — |
| Historical trends | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, ReportGenerator scores higher on our published basis.