Marble Case Manager
6.6#1 in aml compliance softwareFree planFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitMarble Case Manager vs Ojuri
What both publish
| Fact | Marble Case Manager | Ojuri |
|---|---|---|
| Audit trail | Case activity, decisions, and workflow changes are tracked, versioned, and timestamped. | Ojuri records each decision and the feature snapshot used at inference before returning the response. |
| Deployment | The investigation page describes SaaS or on-premise deployment, including multi-tenant self-hosted and multi-instance options. | The quickstart uses Docker Compose and requires Docker and Node 20; the investigation model is optional and downloads about 7.6 GB of weights when enabled. |
| Integrations | Marble says its open data model can unify data from core banking and third-party tools, and its REST API can create and update objects. | The stack uses Kafka, Redis, PostgreSQL, ONNX Runtime, Docker Compose, NGINX, and Prometheus/Grafana components. |
| Purpose | Marble Case Manager replaces fragmented tools, spreadsheets, and manual processes with an AI-powered case management product for fraud and AML investigations. | Ojuri is a self-hosted fraud detection engine that scores transactions and returns accept, review, or decline decisions. |
Marble Case Manager plans
- FreeFree
- StartPriced on request
- EnterprisePriced on request
Ojuri plans
- FreeFree
- OjuriFree
Pick Marble Case Manager if…
Marble is aimed at banks, fintechs, crypto exchanges, and companies whose core business involves moving money. It may suit investigation teams that need case information, alert analysis, reporting, and workflow controls in one product.
Pick Ojuri if…
Ojuri suits fintechs and payment platforms that need transaction scoring within their own infrastructure. It may also suit teams that want analyst review, model monitoring, and investigation tools alongside live scoring.