Kubewarden vs Nirmata Enterprise for Kyverno
Nirmata Enterprise for Kyverno
6.4 #13 in Infrastructure Policy as Code Tools
About Nirmata Enterprise for Kyverno| Kubewarden | Nirmata Enterprise for Kyverno | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Policy language | WebAssembly-compatible languages including Rust, Go, CEL, and Rego | Kubernetes-native YAML and CEL |
| IaC formats | Kubernetes resources and admission requests in YAML/JSON | Kubernetes manifests, Terraform plans, OpenTofu plans, Dockerfiles, AWS CDK, CloudFormation templates, Ansible playbooks |
| Policy testing | Yes | Yes |
| Admission control | Yes | Yes |
| Runtime enforcement | Yes | — |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | Yes |
| Policy reporting | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Infrastructure Policy as Code Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, Kubewarden scores higher on our published basis.