Jenkins
6.3#8 in ci failure analysis and flaky test toolsWebLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitJenkins vs Qualflare
What both publish
| Fact | Jenkins | Qualflare |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | The Jenkins security page says the project will not provide compliance documents, certifications, or questionnaire responses. | Qualflare stores customer data in the European Union and states that it does not currently hold SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 certification. |
| Integrations | Jenkins uses plugins to integrate with tools across the CI/CD toolchain, including source control systems such as Git, Subversion, and Perforce. | Official integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Slack, Discord, Jira, and webhooks. |
| Security | Jenkins documents access controls and security settings; some protections are enabled by default when the interactive setup wizard is used. | Qualflare states that it uses TLS 1.2+ in transit, AES-256 at rest, role-based access control, mandatory SSO and MFA for staff, and immutable employee-access audit logs. |
Jenkins plans
No prices published.
Qualflare plans
- Open source planFree
- StarterFree
- Core$16 a month
- Scale$48 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Jenkins if…
Jenkins suits software delivery teams looking for anything from a basic CI server to a configurable delivery hub. It is aimed at teams working with continuous integration, continuous delivery, and modern software delivery practices.
Pick Qualflare if…
Qualflare suits software teams coordinating manual and automated test management across supported frameworks and CI/CD workflows. It can also fit teams that need failure analysis or mobile test-result ingestion without running mobile tests through the platform.