EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Goodloading vs Kubova

Goodloading logo

Goodloading

7.5#1 in load planning softwareFrom €18 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

Kubova

7.3#2 in load planning softwareFrom $29 a month
Free planWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactGoodloadingKubova
3D visualizationArranged projects are shown in interactive 3D, where users can rotate the view and move loads manually.Results provide an interactive CAD-style 3D layout with exact piece coordinates and dimensions.
IntegrationsGoodloading advertises integrations for TMS, WMS, ERP, SAP and route-planning systems.The product can be called by Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Cline, VS Code, n8n and other MCP-compatible clients.
LanguagesThe interface is offered in Polish, English, French, German, Russian, Czech, Turkish and Spanish.The site currently lists English, Vietnamese, Simplified Chinese and Spanish, with more languages planned.
Notable newsA March 2025 release added the ability to create Trans.eu transport offers and orders directly from Goodloading projects.Kubova published its AI-agent container-loading integration article on 8 June 2026.

Goodloading plans

  • FreemiumFree
  • PRO trial€3, paid once
  • PRO annual (1 user)€18 a month

Kubova plans

  • FreeFree
  • Pro$29 a month
  • Team$69 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick Goodloading if…

Goodloading suits transport, freight, logistics, manufacturing, retail, and software teams planning cargo loads. It may also suit users who need to share or import loading plans and can work around the free version's feature limits.

Pick Kubova if…

Kubova suits logistics teams such as exporters, freight forwarders, and 3PLs that need loading plans and capacity estimates. Pro may fit users who need REST or MCP API access; the Free plan is limited to the web UI.

Charts they share