Gendo
7.4#2 in ai architectural rendering softwareFrom £79 a monthFree planWeb
VisitGendo vs Harth
What both publish
| Fact | Gendo | Harth |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | The in-browser canvas supports simultaneous generations, comments, notes, shared images, and team iteration. | Harth supports simultaneous model work with live cursors, presence, threaded comments pinned over 3D, and per-project voice. |
| Intended users | Gendo describes its audience as design-led studios and teams of 2–50 who need faster visual decisions without specialist visualization pipelines. | Harth says it is built for architecture practices of roughly 15 to 30 people in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. |
| Product | Gendo is a collaborative AI canvas for architectural visualization where architects and designers generate photorealistic renders, iterate, and align on a shared workspace. | Harth is a browser-based workspace for architecture practices to design, research, collaborate, and present projects, with AI agents working on building data. |
Gendo plans
- Students Educational PlanFree
- Educational PlanFree
- FreeFree
- Video pack — 100 seconds£40, paid once
- Video pack 100 seconds£40, paid once
- Video pack — 250 seconds£75, paid once
Harth plans
- FreeFree
- Plus$59 a month
- Small credit pack$99, paid once
- Pro$149 a month
- Medium credit pack$199, paid once
- Large credit pack$399, paid once
Pick Gendo if…
Gendo suits architects and design teams who want to generate and revise visualizations in a shared workspace. The free plan may suit individual exploration, while teams handling confidential prompts should consider the stated plan distinctions.
Pick Harth if…
Harth is aimed at architecture practices, particularly practices of roughly 15 to 30 people in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. It suits teams that want model-based collaboration, AI agent skills, site context, and presentation tools in a browser workspace.