FullEnrich
6.3#19 in data enrichment software$55 usage-basedWebAPI
VisitFullEnrich vs OpenGTM
What both publish
| Fact | FullEnrich | OpenGTM |
|---|---|---|
| API | The API supports enriching contacts individually or in bulk, with results delivered by webhook or polling. | A generated REST reference exposes endpoints for leads, workbooks, audiences, automations, CRM, outreach, signals, governance, and other operations. |
| Integrations | The integrations page lists MCP Server, Claude, OpenAI, Manus, OpenClaw, Zapier, Make, n8n, Clay, and HubSpot. | Documented destinations include HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, Google Sheets, Airtable, Instantly, Smartlead, webhooks, warehouses, and consent-gated ad audiences. |
| Intended users | The pricing page says the product is built for GTM teams, AI agents, agencies, and API resellers. | The README describes OpenGTM as an open-source, self-hosted alternative to Clay.com for lead sourcing, enrichment, AI research, buying signals, and outbound automation. |
| Product | FullEnrich finds and verifies prospect work emails, personal emails, and mobile phone numbers through waterfall enrichment across multiple data providers. | OpenGTM is an open-source, self-hosted workspace for GTM teams and their agents. |
FullEnrich plans
- Free trialFree
- Pro$55 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
OpenGTM plans
- OpenGTM (self-hosted)Free
- OpenGTM self-hostedFree
Pick FullEnrich if…
FullEnrich suits GTM teams, AI agents, agencies, and API resellers seeking verified prospect contact data. It also fits teams needing web, API, and workflow-tool integrations.
Pick OpenGTM if…
It suits GTM teams that want to manage lead sourcing, enrichment, research and outbound automation on infrastructure they control. Teams should be prepared to set up Docker and manage provider costs and production security requirements.