EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

FauxLens vs Pella Research

FauxLens logo

FauxLens

7.6#1 in ai deepfake detection tools$2.99 one-time
Free planAndroidWebAPIExtension
Visit

What both publish

FactFauxLensPella Research
APIThe REST API accepts image files, video files, or a URL and returns structured JSON with a verdict, confidence score, and per-layer evidence chain.The detection API is a REST endpoint that returns calibrated authenticity scores and per-segment analysis, with access granted on request.
HeadquartersPalm Beach Gardens, Florida, United StatesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Intended usersThe about page says FauxLens is built for journalists, HR teams, researchers, and others who need to assess whether media is authentic.Pella describes its work as serving platforms, journalists, courts, and researchers investigating whether audio is synthetic.
ProductFauxLens detects AI-generated and manipulated images and video, returning a verdict, confidence score, and forensic evidence.Pella Research builds models to detect synthetic speech by analyzing vocoder artifacts, spectral statistics, and prosodic cues.

FauxLens plans

  • FreeFree
  • Starter$2.99, paid once
  • Pro$9.99, paid once
  • Max$19.99, paid once
  • API Starter$99.99, paid once
  • API Pro$349.99, paid once

Pella Research plans

No prices published.

Pick FauxLens if…

It suits journalists, HR teams, researchers, and others assessing whether media may be authentic. Developers can use its API for integrations, subject to request limits and the informational nature of its verdicts.

Pick Pella Research if…

Pella Research is aimed at journalists, platforms, courts, researchers, and institutions investigating whether audio is synthetic. Its API is available by request, with a free tier listed for accredited journalists and academics.

Charts they share