EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

FanExam vs TAO

FanExam

6.7#15 in quiz maker softwareFrom $29 a month
Free planWeb
Visit
TAO logo

TAO

8.4#1 in automated grading softwareFrom $149 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactFanExamTAO
IntegrationsFanExam describes automatic integrations with Google Analytics and Intercom.Listed integrations include Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard, GeoGebra, Proctorio, MathType, Wiris and Texthelp.
PurposeFanExam provides an NPS solution for SaaS apps and websites that surveys customers and reports their scores and responses.TAO is an online assessment platform for creating, delivering and managing digital assessments.
SecurityFanExam says it uses administrative, physical, and electronic measures to protect information and offers service through an encrypted connection at the user's choice.TAO says cloud and on-premise customer content is encrypted, access is restricted, backups are maintained and external penetration tests are periodically conducted.
SupportThe pricing page lists community support for Free, email support for Starter and Basic, and priority email support for Professional.Community Edition support is through the TAO Community Forum and User Guide; paid plans offer additional support options.

FanExam plans

  • Starter$29 a month
  • Basic$99 a month
  • Professional$499 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request
  • Free—

TAO plans

  • TAO Community EditionFree
  • TAO StarterFree
  • TAO Author$149 a month
  • TAO Ignite$990 a month
  • TAO ElevatePriced on request
  • TAO EnterprisePriced on request

Pick FanExam if…

FanExam suits website and SaaS operators who want to gather NPS ratings and segment responses by visitor traits. Its survey customization and email routing may suit teams managing feedback across different audiences.

Pick TAO if…

TAO suits solo authors, educators, and organizations that need to create and deliver digital assessments. Starter is intended for solo authors, small-scale classroom assessment, or piloting, rather than large team-based programs.

Charts they share