EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

EQS Integrity Line vs OnePointe

OnePointe logo

OnePointe

6.4#6 in workplace investigation software
WebAPImacOSWindows
Visit

What both publish

FactEQS Integrity LineOnePointe
HeadquartersMunich, GermanyPortland, Oregon, United States
Intended customersThe vendor describes Essential as intended for small and medium-sized companies, while its solution pages also address large companies, corporations and public-sector organisations.The platform is presented for institutions and organizations, including higher-education institutions, government agencies, employers, and nonprofits.
SecurityEQS says the system is hosted in Germany and uses ISO 27001-certified data centres, end-to-end encryption, two-factor authentication and regular external security audits.Customer data is encrypted in transit with TLS 1.3 and at rest with AES-256, and tenant isolation is enforced using database row-level security.
SupportThe packages list email and an online service portal for support, and the vendor says project managers provide implementation support and best-practice consulting.The site lists product support at [email protected] and office hours Monday–Friday, 8am–6pm Pacific.

EQS Integrity Line plans

  • Essential£85 a month
  • Professional£170 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

OnePointe plans

  • Year 1 setup$2,000 a month
  • Year 1 monthly$250 a month
  • Year 1 all-in$5,000
  • Year 2—
  • Year 3+$1.75 a year
  • Founding-partner rate — Year 3+$1.75 a year

Pick EQS Integrity Line if…

EQS Integrity Line suits organisations that need internal reporting and case handling for employees and third parties. The vendor describes Essential for small and medium-sized companies, while other solutions address larger organisations and public-sector bodies.

Pick OnePointe if…

It suits institutions and organizations handling civil-rights, conduct or workplace investigations, including higher-education institutions, government agencies, employers and nonprofits. Teams wanting AI assistance with human review may find its workflow relevant.

Charts they share