EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

django CMS vs Webflow CMS

django CMS logo

django CMS

8.3#5 in content management systemsFrom $500 a year
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

Webflow CMS

8.3#4 in content management systemsFrom $15 a month
Free planWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

Factdjango CMSWebflow CMS
Custom content typesYesYes
Custom user rolesYesYes
Editorial workflowsYesYes
Founded20072013
Free planYesYes
HeadquartersZurich, SwitzerlandSan Francisco, California, United States
Integrationsdjango CMS can integrate custom Django applications, while add-ons provide capabilities such as rich-text editing, Bootstrap 5 components, media management, versioning, and reusable content blocks.Webflow’s integrations library includes categories such as analytics, CRM, ecommerce, forms, localization, maps, payment processing, search, and social media.
Media libraryYesYes
Multilingual contentYesYes
Platform typeself_hostedWebflow describes its CMS as a visual-first, composable CMS and a hybrid CMS.
SEO toolsYesYes
SupportCommunity support includes technical documentation, Stack Overflow, Discord, GitHub Issues, and an AI chat service.Webflow lists the Help Center, Support Portal, and Webflow University, while its Team plan includes priority support.

django CMS plans

  • django CMSFree
  • Supporter Association Membership$2 a month
  • Bronze Association Membership$500 a year
  • Silver Association Membership$1,500 a year
  • Gold Association Membership$3,000 a year
  • Platinum Association Membership$15,000 a year

Webflow CMS plans

  • StarterFree
  • Basic$15 a month
  • Premium$25 a month
  • Team$2,500 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick django CMS if…

django CMS suits enterprises, universities, and digital agencies building content-rich websites with Django. It is also relevant to teams that need multilingual or multi-site publishing and custom application integration.

Pick Webflow CMS if…

Webflow CMS is aimed at marketing, design, and engineering teams, as well as agencies creating content-rich sites. Its visual editing and editorial workflow features may suit teams that manage site content together.

Charts they share