EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Cubic vs DeepSource

Cubic logo

Cubic

7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit
DeepSource logo

DeepSource

8.0#1 in ai code review toolsFrom $30 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactCubicDeepSource
CLIThe CLI installs with Cubic’s shell installer, supports local reviews and CI API-key authentication, and is documented for macOS, Linux and Windows.The command-line client retrieves issues, metrics, vulnerabilities and reviews, submits coverage artifacts, and supports JSON output for automation.
Company profileLinkedIn describes cubic as privately held, headquartered in the software-development sector and employing 2–10 people.LinkedIn lists DeepSource as a privately held software-development company headquartered in San Francisco, with 11–50 employees and a 2018 founding year.
IntegrationsOfficial integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows.The directory lists integrations for Azure DevOps Services, Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Okta, OneLogin, Slack, and Vanta.
Productcubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues.DeepSource describes itself as an AI code review platform that automates code reviews for teams writing code with AI.

Cubic plans

  • StarterFree
  • Starter FreeFree
  • Team$30 a month
  • Team$40 a month
  • Pro$79 a month
  • Pro$99 a month

DeepSource plans

  • IndividualFree
  • Open SourceFree
  • SCA add-on$8 a month
  • AI Review Standard$8, paid once
  • AI Review Advanced$15, paid once
  • Team$30 a month

Pick Cubic if…

Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.

Pick DeepSource if…

It suits software teams looking for pull-request review and code-security checks alongside coverage tracking. Teams can compare the free Open Source tier with Team or Enterprise, depending on their listed allowances and deployment needs.

Charts they share