Crismo
6.8#11 in process mapping softwareFree planFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitCrismo vs Flowable
What both publish
| Fact | Crismo | Flowable |
|---|---|---|
| Rating on G2 | 0 out of 5 from 0 reviews | 4.3 out of 5 from 13 reviews |
| REST API | The REST API is workspace-scoped, uses bearer API keys, and provides diagram, value-chain, dictionary, attribute, sharing and milestone endpoints. | Official REST documentation covers APIs for process, case, decision, content, forms, identity, applications, agents and other services, with near-complete Java API coverage. |
| Self-hosting | The maker advertises on-premise deployment as an Enterprise option. | Flowable can run as Java applications, Docker or Kubernetes deployments, Tomcat WARs, customer-managed infrastructure or managed cloud. |
Crismo plans
- IndividualFree
- Crismo AIPriced on request
- Crismo OptimisePriced on request
- EnterprisePriced on request
- Team—
Flowable plans
- Community EditionFree
- Flowable Open SourceFree
- Flowable Platform$99 a month
- Agentic Case PlatformPriced on request
- Case PlatformPriced on request
Pick Crismo if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Flowable if…
It suits organisations coordinating casework and processes across people, systems, and AI agents, particularly in banking, insurance, healthcare, and government. Teams can choose between cloud deployment and running engines in their own application or infrastructure.