Coveralls
6.8#4 in test coverage toolsFrom $10 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitCoveralls vs SimpleCov
What both publish
| Fact | Coveralls | SimpleCov |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Coveralls says it works with any CI service and offers over 30 community-created integrations plus a GitHub Action and CircleCI Orb. | The README points to open source formatter and integration plugins, editor integrations, and hosted commercial services. |
| Purpose | Coveralls analyzes test coverage to show which parts of code are not covered by tests. | SimpleCov analyzes Ruby code coverage using Ruby’s built-in Coverage library. |
| Support | The pricing page offers a $200/month Support add-on with premium support, priority response, and live chat. | The project directs users to its issue tracker for code and bug reports and its Google Groups mailing list for discussion and announcements. |
Coveralls plans
- Open SourceFree
- Starter$10 a month
- Usage add-on$30 a month
- Enterprise Cloud$35 a month
- Org$50 a month
- Org+$100 a month
SimpleCov plans
- SimpleCovFree
Pick Coveralls if…
Coveralls suits development teams that want coverage details by file and line, historical trends, and pull-request checks. Its free open-source option may suit maintainers of public projects; private repositories have paid plans starting at $10/mo.
Pick SimpleCov if…
SimpleCov suits Ruby developers who need coverage reports, thresholds, or a view of which tests cover particular lines. Its Rails profile may also suit projects that include ERB, Haml, or Slim templates.