Carbide Network
7.6#4 in decentralized storage services$0.01 usage-basedFree planAndroidiOSAPImacOS
VisitCarbide Network vs Walrus
What both publish
| Fact | Carbide Network | Walrus |
|---|---|---|
| Developer support | The developer docs describe a Swift SDK with async APIs for provider discovery, upload, download, and key management. | Walrus Memory provides TypeScript and Python SDKs, a relayer, smart contract, indexer, and dashboard. |
| Encryption | The site says files are encrypted on the user’s device with AES-256-GCM and that providers cannot see the data under its zero-knowledge architecture. | Console encrypts files client-side with Seal before upload, stores ciphertext, and does not see plaintext or decryption keys. |
Carbide Network plans
- Home providerFree
- Personal storageFree
- Professional providerFree
- Enterprise provider$0.01 a month
Walrus plans
- Walrus Memory (launch period)Free
Pick Carbide Network if…
Carbide may suit individuals seeking encrypted storage for personal files and organizations needing team controls or geographic redundancy. Developers can also consider its API-first, S3-compatible storage.
Pick Walrus if…
Walrus Memory may suit developers and AI-agent builders seeking persistent memory across applications and sessions. The Console is currently limited to invite-only beta access, while storage costs and expires according to its paid duration.