EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Bifrost vs Routerly

Bifrost logo

Bifrost

7.6#3 in llm gateway softwareFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

Routerly

7.0#16 in llm gatewaysFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactBifrostRouterly
Budget controlsTeams can set spending limits and track costs by teams, projects and models.Budgets can be set globally, per project, or per token, and can track cost, calls, or token usage over rolling or calendar windows.
DeploymentBifrost can run as a self-hosted binary or through npx, Docker and Kubernetes, including private-cloud and disconnected environments.The maker provides Docker and installer-based deployment, and says the installer supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Intended usersThe OSS edition is presented for developers, small teams, and self-managed deployments, while Enterprise is for teams running production AI systems at scale.The site describes Routerly as built for developers and use cases ranging from indie projects to enterprise deployments, including SaaS teams and local-first development.
ProductBifrost is an enterprise AI gateway and control plane for routing, governing, and securing AI traffic, including LLM calls, MCP tools, and agents.Routerly is a self-hosted gateway between applications and AI providers that routes requests, tracks costs, and enforces budgets.
SecurityThe security documentation describes Snyk dependency and code scanning, CodeQL analysis, Docker image scanning, and hardened non-root production containers.The documentation says provider API keys and project tokens are AES-256 encrypted at rest, and user passwords are bcrypt-hashed.

Bifrost plans

  • OSSFree
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Routerly plans

  • Free self-hostedFree

Pick Bifrost if…

The OSS edition suits developers and small teams that can manage a self-hosted deployment. Enterprise targets teams running production AI systems at scale and needing additional controls or SLA-backed support.

Pick Routerly if…

Routerly is aimed at developers and teams, including SaaS groups and local-first projects, that want to manage AI-provider routing and budgets on their own infrastructure. It may suit users who need project-level separation and compatible OpenAI- or Anthropic-format clients.

Charts they share