AttackIQ Platform
7.9#1 in offensive securityFrom $4,995 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitAttackIQ Platform vs FourCore ATTACK
FourCore ATTACK
5.8#12 in breach and attack simulation softwareWebLinuxSelf-hostedWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | AttackIQ Platform | FourCore ATTACK |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | AttackIQ offers SaaS and on-premises software, and its federal solution is described as designed for on-premises operation. | The FAQ says FourCore ATTACK is available as an AWS-hosted SaaS platform and invites customers to contact FourCore about on-premises solutions. |
| Integrations | Published integration materials name Microsoft 365, Palo Alto Panorama, ServiceNow, Splunk, Elastic, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm, Azure Sentinel, Okta, Qualys, Tenable and AWS-related services. | Listed integrations include CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft Sentinel, QRadar, Trend Micro Vision One, Proofpoint, Cisco Secure Email, Cortex XDR, and ServiceNow. |
| Intended users | AttackIQ says it serves Fortune 500 enterprises, federal agencies, and MSSPs. | The platform is presented for security teams responsible for detection, response, and control assurance, including SecOps and detection engineering teams. |
| Purpose | AttackIQ describes its platform as a CTEM platform for modeling adversary behavior, prioritizing attack paths, validating controls, and measuring security improvement. | FourCore ATTACK continuously simulates real-world cyberattacks to validate whether security controls work. |
AttackIQ Platform plans
- Flex FreeFree
- FreeFree
- Pay-as-you-go$300, paid once
- Flex Pay-as-you-go$300, paid once
- Monthly$4,995 a month
- Flex Monthly$4,995 a month
FourCore ATTACK plans
No prices published.
Pick AttackIQ Platform if…
AttackIQ describes its intended users as Fortune 500 enterprises, federal agencies, and MSSPs. It suits teams seeking to validate security controls and model attack paths across their environments.
Pick FourCore ATTACK if…
FourCore ATTACK is aimed at security teams that need to assess detection and response controls across multiple attack surfaces. It may suit SecOps or detection engineering teams that want to map simulation outcomes to MITRE ATT&CK and retest changes.