Appetize
7.5#4 in device farm softwareFrom $59 a monthFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAppetize vs TestingBot
TestingBot
7.9#2 in device farm softwareFrom $20 a monthAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Appetize | TestingBot |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Its Appetize AI page names GitHub Actions, GitLab, Bitrise, and Jenkins as CI/CD integrations and also lists Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor support through the CLI and REST API. | Official integrations include Slack, Jira, GitHub and CI/CD systems such as GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, Travis CI, TeamCity and Azure DevOps. |
| Security | Appetize states that it maintains an ISO 27001 security program, is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, and has a CSA CAIQ with over 260 controls across 17 domains. | TestingBot states that each test uses a single-use machine and wiped device, with infrastructure in European data centers and GDPR and CSA STAR claims. |
| Support | The pricing page directs users to submit a support ticket and lists 24/7 support for Enterprise. | Paid plans advertise 24x7 support by email, chat and Slack, while the documentation directs users to email and a Slack workspace. |
Appetize plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$59 a month
- Premium$319 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
TestingBot plans
- Live$20 a month
- Automated$50 a month
- Pay As You Go€60, paid once
- Automated Pro$90 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Appetize if…
Appetize suits teams that need browser-accessible iOS and Android app previews, testing, or demos. It may also suit teams building Playwright tests or sharing uploaded apps through embedded sessions.
Pick TestingBot if…
TestingBot suits software teams that need browser and physical-device testing across automation frameworks, manual sessions, and CI workflows. Its free plan and trial may help teams evaluate those options.