Apache Ozone
6.1#7 in data lake softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitApache Ozone vs Parseable
What both publish
| Fact | Apache Ozone | Parseable |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The documentation provides deployment guides for Docker, Kubernetes, and bare metal. | Parseable offers self-hosted OSS, managed cloud, and enterprise deployments with BYOC. |
| Integrations | The project lists Hive, Spark, Flink, Iceberg, Trino, Impala, Ranger, Knox, Kerberos, Prometheus, Grafana, Oozie, Hue, HBase, and DistCp as integrations. | The site lists integrations including Prometheus, Grafana, Kafka, Redpanda, AWS, Azure, OpenTelemetry, Kubernetes, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, MinIO, OpenAI, and Anthropic. |
| Security | Ozone supports Kerberos authentication, ACLs, Ranger policy management, TLS/SSL in transit, and TDE at rest. | The site identifies Parseable as GDPR certified and SOC 2 Type II. |
| Support | The Apache Software Foundation says it does not provide formal or commercial support for its software packages. | The Enterprise plan includes premium support with a dedicated SLA, and the site lists 24×7 product support via portal in its plan comparison. |
Apache Ozone plans
- Apache OzoneFree
Parseable plans
- OSSFree
- Cloud$0.39 a month
- Enterprise$15,000 a year
Pick Apache Ozone if…
It suits teams building data lakes, lakehouse platforms, or large-scale storage for AI/ML, cloud-native, Hadoop, or Spark workloads. It is for organizations able to deploy and administer self-hosted storage.
Pick Parseable if…
Parseable suits teams that want logs, metrics, and traces in one observability platform, with a choice of self-hosted or managed deployment. The Enterprise plan is described for serious teams seeking enterprise-grade observability.