Anteon vs Qpoint
| Anteon | Qpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $99/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Paid from | 99 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | Yes |
| Network visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Application tracing | Yes | Yes |
| Kernel profiling | No | — |
| Supported operating systems | Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+, Debian 10, CentOS 8+) and macOS 10.15+; Windows not supported | Linux-based operating systems; kernel 5.10+; x86_64 and arm64 |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, Qpoint scores higher on our published basis.