Anchor
8.6#2 in proposal softwareFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAnchor vs Pitchwick
What both publish
| Fact | Anchor | Pitchwick |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics and reporting | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in e-signatures | Yes | Yes |
| Client activity tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Client portal | Clients receive a portal for agreements, invoices and payment methods. | Clients can review, comment on, and accept proposals through a private portal link without an account. |
| CRM integrations | Yes | No |
| Custom branding | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | Native or listed connections include QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Gmail, Outlook, Zapier, Make, Slack, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot, monday.com and multiple practice-management systems. | The privacy policy says payment processing is handled by Stripe and AI proposal generation uses Anthropic’s Claude API. |
| Online payment collection | Yes | Yes |
Anchor plans
- Platform accessFree
- Payment fee$5 a month
- Pay-as-you-go$5, paid once
Pitchwick plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$9 a month
- Pro$29 a month
Pick Anchor if…
Anchor suits businesses that need to prepare client proposals and agreements, then manage invoicing and payment collection. Its free plan may suit teams that want unlimited users and clients without a subscription fee.
Pick Pitchwick if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.