Anchor
8.6#2 in proposal softwareFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAnchor vs Ombud
What both publish
| Fact | Anchor | Ombud |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics and reporting | Yes | Yes |
| Client activity tracking | Yes | Yes |
| CRM integrations | Yes | Yes |
| Custom branding | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | Native or listed connections include QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Gmail, Outlook, Zapier, Make, Slack, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot, monday.com and multiple practice-management systems. | The product page identifies Salesforce access and integration as a way to connect sales opportunities with Ombud workflows. |
| Security controls | Anchor says it holds SOC 2 Type II, encrypts data in transit and at rest, and applies scoped permissions to integrations. | The product page lists ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certification, role-based access, SAML 2.0 SSO, encryption in transit, session timeouts, and configurable NIST password protections. |
Anchor plans
- Platform accessFree
- Payment fee$5 a month
- Pay-as-you-go$5, paid once
Ombud plans
- Custom pricingPriced on request
Pick Anchor if…
Anchor suits businesses that need to prepare client proposals and agreements, then manage invoicing and payment collection. Its free plan may suit teams that want unlimited users and clients without a subscription fee.
Pick Ombud if…
Ombud is aimed at enterprise RevOps teams, especially sales engineering and response management roles. The demo page describes its RFP response offering for sales teams handling 100 or more RFPs per year.