Anchor
8.6#2 in proposal softwareFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitAnchor vs Avobill
What both publish
| Fact | Anchor | Avobill |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics and reporting | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in e-signatures | Yes | Yes |
| Client activity tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Client portal | Clients receive a portal for agreements, invoices and payment methods. | The client portal supports magic-link access, branded presentation, payment history, and invoice downloads. |
| Custom branding | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Headquarters | New York, New York, United States | Bangalore, Karnataka, India |
| Integrations | Native or listed connections include QuickBooks Online, Xero, NetSuite, Sage, Gmail, Outlook, Zapier, Make, Slack, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot, monday.com and multiple practice-management systems. | The site describes invoice sharing through WhatsApp and email and UPI payments through QR codes, but the integrations page itself was not available to read. |
| Payment methods | Clients can pre-authorize ACH or credit-card payments before services are delivered. | The site says invoice UPI QR payments go directly to the seller’s bank account with 0% gateway commission. |
Anchor plans
- Platform accessFree
- Payment fee$5 a month
- Pay-as-you-go$5, paid once
Avobill plans
- Free ForeverFree
- FreeFree
- Pro Plan$59 a year
Pick Anchor if…
Anchor suits businesses that need to prepare client proposals and agreements, then manage invoicing and payment collection. Its free plan may suit teams that want unlimited users and clients without a subscription fee.
Pick Avobill if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.