AFL++ vs Metalware
| AFL++ | Metalware | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | €1666.67/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Input generation methods | mutation | generation and mutation, with symbolic input generation |
| Target types | source-code targets, binary-only targets, file inputs, stdin inputs, Android native libraries, Win32 PE binaries | ELF and raw .bin firmware; ARM Cortex-M, embedded peripherals, DMA, RTOS, and bare metal targets |
| Coverage guidance | Yes | Yes |
| Crash triage | Yes | Yes |
| Execution mode | local | hybrid |
| Supported languages | C, C++, Python, Rust | — |
| CI/CD support | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Fuzz Testing Software. On Everything Xiaomi, AFL++ scores higher on our published basis.