Accessibility Test Framework for Android vs FossID Workbench
Accessibility Test Framework for Android
6.8 #77 in Accessibility Testing Software
About Accessibility Test Framework for Android| Accessibility Test Framework for Android | FossID Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, Linux, macOS, Windows | Web, Linux |
| Supported ecosystems | Go, Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, .NET, C++, Dart, Erlang, Elixir, Haskell, PHP, R, Rust, Swift, Julia, Lua, Nim, Perl; Alpine/APK, DPKG, RPM, Pacman, Homebrew, MacPorts, Chocolatey, Portage, Nix, Spack, Flatpak, Snap, OPKG, Zypper | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Pull request scanning | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Accessibility Test Framework for Android scores higher on our published basis.