Diligent Audit

Diligent Audit is internal audit management software for teams planning, executing and reporting audits. It is best suited to organizations that want audit work tied to enterprise risk, control monitoring and board reporting. Its breadth and AI-assisted workflows are compelling, though prospective customers must request custom pricing.

Overview

Diligent Audit brings planning, evidence collection, control testing, findings and remediation into an internal-audit workflow. Connecting plans to enterprise risk and prioritizing risk can help audit leaders direct assurance work toward higher-priority areas. The trade-off is scope: supported audit types center on internal audit, so it is not the natural choice for teams seeking a general-purpose audit program.

Questionnaires, framework mapping, workflow automation and a SOX control library support structured programs. Diligent also describes ownership structures, governance documents, filing-deadline tracking and multi-country jurisdiction coverage, which broaden its governance capabilities. Buyers should weigh that range against the need to request a quote before comparing cost with team size or audit volume.

Key features

AI-assisted audit work

AuditAI can carry prior audits forward, draft evidence requests, send follow-ups, execute control tests and prepare reports. These functions target recurring coordination and documentation work; they do not remove reviewer responsibility. Diligent says consequential AI actions require human approval, recommendations can be explained and overridden, and actions are recorded in an audit trail. That is a meaningful safeguard for teams unwilling to delegate material audit decisions to automation.

Risk, controls and reporting

The connection between audit plans and enterprise risk, paired with risk prioritization and natural-language data analysis, is useful for teams that need to turn risk signals into a work plan. Continuous control monitoring can flag gaps and exceptions, while actions remain subject to review. Control testing workflows, deficiency management, management certifications and remediation tracking support the path from testing to follow-up.

AI summaries and board-ready reporting can help audit leaders communicate findings to executives. Connectors for SAP, Oracle and Concur provide routes into common business systems. Mobile apps and offline modes support fieldwork, although the product's platform summary identifies mobile apps as web-only; buyers who depend on native mobile use should confirm what that means for their deployment.

Implementation and safeguards

Diligent says streamlined onboarding and pre-built workflow templates help most organizations move from manual processes within three months. That points to a defined transition path, but the stated timeframe is not a guarantee for every organization. Security provisions include FedRAMP and DoD IL5 authorization, end-to-end encryption, audit trails and role-based access controls, relevant for teams handling sensitive audit work.

Pricing

Diligent Audit is paid software with custom pricing; prospective customers must request a quote. There is no free plan, so teams cannot use a free tier to evaluate it indefinitely. Because no published rate or seat or usage quota is available, organizations should establish expected costs and terms directly with Diligent before deciding whether the platform's breadth fits their budget.

Platforms

Diligent Audit is identified for web, iOS, Android and API access. Diligent's audit materials describe mobile apps and offline modes for fieldwork, while the product summary calls its mobile apps web-only. That tension makes confirmation of supported mobile workflows especially important for teams working away from a network connection.

Who it's for

Internal audit teams and chief audit executives are the clearest fit, particularly at organizations that need risk-linked planning, control monitoring, structured remediation and assurance reporting. Teams that rely on offline fieldwork may value the mobile capabilities, provided the precise app support meets their needs. Buyers seeking broad audit-type coverage, a transparent published price or a free plan should look elsewhere.

Pros and cons

• Pros: AI assists with repeat audit tasks from evidence requests through reporting, while human approval and recorded actions preserve oversight of consequential work.
• Pros: Risk prioritization, continuous monitoring and remediation workflows connect planning with control follow-through.
• Pros: Enterprise connectors and security controls support integration and sensitive audit programs.
• Cons: Custom pricing and no free plan make budget screening and open-ended evaluation harder.
• Cons: Internal audit is the supported audit type, limiting its fit for organizations needing coverage beyond that scope.
• Cons: The differing descriptions of mobile app support warrant clarification for teams that depend on native or offline fieldwork.

Alternatives

For a broader comparison, browse Audit Management Software. Choose SOX Compliance Software if your search is centered on SOX compliance, or Third-Party Risk Management Software for vendor-risk needs. Legal Entity Management Software, Board Management Software and HR Policy Management Software cover adjacent categories rather than Diligent Audit's core internal-audit focus.

SecurityScorecard Third-Party Risk Management has a free-forever plan at no cost for domain security ratings, digital-footprint management, alerts and questionnaire response, making it worth considering when a free starting point for third-party cyber risk matters more than internal-audit workflows. Drata offers paid GRC plans, including GRC Foundation for up to 50 FTEs and one pre-mapped framework; choose it when that compliance-oriented scope better matches your needs. Whistic offers a free plan and vendor review workflows, so it is a better fit for organizations prioritizing vendor assessments.

Black Kite Third-Party Cyber Risk is a paid, web-based alternative with onboarding and unlimited users on its Standard plan; consider it when third-party cyber-risk coverage is the priority. ProcessUnity Third-Party Risk Management lists a small- and medium-business plan at from $25,000 (priced on request) for companies up to $500M in revenue and 1,000 employees, a specific option for organizations within that segment. Bitsight External Attack Surface Management is a paid option priced by solution, capabilities and support needs, for buyers focused on external attack surface management. Compyl Vendor Risk Management uses individually quoted annual subscriptions, with Vendor Risk Management listed in Growth rather than Core; that distinction matters when comparing its tiers. FortaRisks Third-Party Risk offers an Advanced plan with up to 50 monitored vendors and 25 third-party questionnaires per year, which may suit teams seeking defined vendor-risk limits.

Verdict

Diligent Audit is a strong candidate for internal audit leaders who want risk-connected planning, control monitoring and reporting in one workflow, with AI assistance bounded by human review. Its principal drawback is the buying uncertainty: custom pricing and no free plan prevent an easy cost-led trial, and mobile support deserves clarification. Choose it when those governance workflows justify a direct pricing conversation; look elsewhere if transparent pricing, free access or broader audit-type coverage is decisive.