ASTRNT

ASTRNT is a hiring and selection platform for employers and universities, combining interviews, assessments, and candidate scoring. It suits teams that want a structured evaluation workflow or APIs for embedding one in another product. Its broad workflow is balanced by a low ceiling on the free plan and custom pricing for unlimited responses.

Overview

ASTRNT brings CV, psychometric assessment, and video-interview results together in a role-fit score with a ranking justification. That gives teams a shared framework for comparing candidates, but it should support rather than replace human judgment. ASTRNT has served employers and universities since 2016 and describes its customer base as spanning the Asia-Pacific region.

Key features

Interviews and assessments

Structured AI video interviews accept video, text, audio, and screen-recorded responses. Assessments can use video, multiple-choice, or free-text questions in Bahasa or English. Candidates can respond from desktop, mobile, or tablet without a login or download, reducing access friction. Live recording is supported, and transcription covers two languages.

Scoring and integrations

AI auto-scoring, candidate reports, and ASTRNT Recommends help teams organize review. Recommends combines CV, psychometric, and interview scores into a ranking with an explanation, making the output more interpretable than a score alone. ATS webhook integration connects to hiring workflows; APIs allow interviews, assessments, and scoring to be embedded in another product. The API's free developer account is limited to 10 candidates in its dashboard, so it is a starting point rather than an unrestricted deployment path.

Security and support

ASTRNT lists ISO 27001 and GDPR compliance. Its privacy policy says personal information may be stored in Singapore, the United States, or another country where the company stores information, a relevant consideration for organizations with specific data-location requirements. Support handles candidate and recruiter tickets through [email protected].

Pricing

ASTRNT uses a freemium model, with unlimited users and jobs on its free plan but only five candidate responses per month. That makes it suitable for trying a workflow or handling very occasional hiring, not regular recruitment. The cap applies to responses, so unlimited jobs do not translate into high-volume use.

• Free: free, with five candidate responses per month, unlimited users, and unlimited jobs. It provides broad access for a small team, but the response quota is restrictive.
• Applicant credits: $87.50, paid once for one block of 25 credits; additional credits are available at checkout. This is the stated paid option for teams that need more responses without moving to an enterprise proposal.
• Enterprise: custom pricing, billed through a customised proposal. It includes unlimited candidate responses, custom assessments and integrations, and deeper analytics, making it the fit for larger or more tailored deployments.

Because applicant credits are sold as a one-time block and Enterprise is proposal-based, teams should weigh the credit option against their response volume and the need for customization. The free developer account's 10-candidate dashboard limit is separate from the free plan's five responses per month.

Platforms

ASTRNT supports web, iOS, and Android, and offers an API. Candidates can also respond by tablet browser. That range suits teams and applicants using different devices, while the API is useful when the evaluation workflow needs to sit inside another product.

Who it's for

ASTRNT is strongest for employers and universities that want interviews, assessments, and candidate scoring in one workflow, especially those operating across Asia-Pacific or building hiring functionality into their own software. It is less compelling for teams with sustained response volume that need predictable self-service pricing, or organizations that require personal data to remain in a particular country.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Combines structured interviews, varied assessment formats, and scoring; supports Bahasa and English; candidates need no login or download; ATS webhook integration and APIs support connected or embedded workflows.
• Cons: The free tier allows only five candidate responses monthly; applicant credits are sold in blocks of 25; unlimited response capacity requires a custom Enterprise proposal; personal information may be stored in several countries.

Alternatives

Interview Intelligence Software is the broader category to compare when surveying interview-focused tools.

• Hiriso offers a free plan with three AI-powered interviews per month for one user, plus unlimited candidates and job openings; choose it if that free interview allowance and its listed iOS, macOS, web, and Windows support better fit your needs.
• Metaview has paid Pro and Max plans priced per user per month, alongside a free plan; consider it if its profile-sourcing and concurrent-search plans are more relevant than ASTRNT's assessment workflow.
• Hyring has a free plan with 50 monthly credits, one seat, one active job post, English-only support, and one AI voice; choose it if those limits and its web or Windows availability suit your team.
• BarRaiser offers a free Interviewer lite plan with five interviews and interview structure, notes, co-pilot, highlights, and recording; it may suit teams focused on interview support.
• Equip provides a free ATS plan for core ATS functionality, with assessments as paid features; choose it if core applicant tracking is the priority.
• RoundZero has a free plan with one active job, five evaluation reports per job, and one teammate plus the account holder; consider it if that small-team evaluation allowance meets your needs.
• Scorebar AI provides a 30-day free trial with five interviews, one team member, basic AI scoring, and voice and text formats; it may be worth considering for a time-limited evaluation.
• Jobma has paid plans and supports Android, iOS, macOS, web, and Windows; consider it if broader device coverage is the priority.

Verdict

Choose ASTRNT when your team needs candidate interviews, assessments, and explainable scoring together, or wants APIs to embed those capabilities. The free plan is workable only for very low response volumes; teams that recruit regularly should budget for credits or request an Enterprise proposal. Look elsewhere if fixed, higher-volume self-service pricing or guaranteed data residency is essential.