Tiger Bridge vs Triofox
| Tiger Bridge | Triofox | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $0.01/mo | $11/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Android, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Paid from | 0.006 /mo | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | hybrid |
| Global namespace | Yes | Yes |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | SMB/CIFS, NFS, S3-compatible object storage | CIFS/SMB, HTTPS |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Huawei Cloud, Backblaze B2, Google Drive, LYVE Cloud, Wasabi, S3-compatible object storage | Amazon S3, S3-compatible storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, OpenStack, Wasabi, Microsoft SharePoint, WebDAV, Rackspace CloudFiles, Internap XipCloud |
| Edge synchronization | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Triofox scores higher on our published basis.