TextUnited
7.2#3 in computer-assisted translation softwareFrom €150 a monthFree planWebAPI
VisitTextUnited vs WordBeam
What both publish
| Fact | TextUnited | WordBeam |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | API use cases include GitHub CI pipelines, Contentful, Sitecore, Git repositories, Sanity CMS, Next.js, Salesforce and legacy apps. | The maker lists native connectors for Adobe Experience Manager, Contentful, GitHub, GitLab, and Figma. |
| Security | TextUnited states that its API is SOC 2-compliant, GDPR-ready, AES-256 encrypted, hosted on dedicated IBM Cloud infrastructure, with granular RBAC and audit trails. | WordBeam states that it is SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant, with EU data residency by default, and that it does not train public models on customer content. |
| Support | Technical support is provided through a ticket submission process, and the company offers personalized demos. | The pricing page lists 24/7 support for Freelancer and priority 24/7 support for Studio. |
| Translation memory | Yes | WordBeam says its neural translation memory learns a user's tone and terminology across projects. |
TextUnited plans
- Self-Service FREEFree
- Self-Service TEAM€150 a month
- OnePlatform€780 a month
- OneEnterprisePriced on request
WordBeam plans
- Freelancer$30 a month
- Studio$80 a month
- CustomizedPriced on request
Pick TextUnited if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick WordBeam if…
WordBeam suits translators, agencies, multilingual specialists, and teams handling marketing, support, documentation, legal, or compliance content. It is designed for web-based collaborative translation workflows.