SignPath
7.2#2 in code signing softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitSignPath vs sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service
sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service
6.3#9 in code signing softwareFrom $75 a yearWebLinuxmacOSWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | SignPath | sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service |
|---|---|---|
| CI/CD integrations | Documented trusted build connectors support Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, TeamCity and AppVeyor. | Listed compatible environments include Microsoft Azure, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, and GitLab. |
| Deployment | SignPath describes its deployment options as SaaS, self-hosted, or hybrid. | After certificate issuance, users download lightweight signing tools for installation on a server or computer; critical encryption occurs in the cloud HSM. |
| Purpose | SignPath provides code signing and software integrity tools that enforce policies across software builds and releases. | The service provides remote cloud code signing for software applications. |
SignPath plans
- Open Source Code SigningFree
- Code GovernancePriced on request
- Software Integrity PlatformPriced on request
sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service plans
- sslTrus Cloud Code Signing Basic$75 a year
- sslTrus Cloud Code Signing Pro$285 a year
- sslTrus Cloud Code Signing Enterprise$640 a year
- sslTrus Cloud Code Signing Ultimate$2,860 a year
Pick SignPath if…
SignPath suits development teams that need controls around signing and verifying software releases. Its free option is for qualifying open source projects; deployment choices also include self-hosted and hybrid.
Pick sslTrus Remote Code Signing Service if…
The service suits software teams that need remote signing for supported application formats and want shared policies across distributed regions. Its listed integrations may also suit teams using the supported CI/CD environments and build tools.