RobotReviewer
7.5#4 in ai literature review softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitRobotReviewer vs Sysrev
What both publish
| Fact | RobotReviewer | Sysrev |
|---|---|---|
| API | A REST API exposes the underlying models for integration into systematic-review software. | Premium and Enterprise accounts receive API tokens for a REST API described by an OpenAPI specification with an interactive web interface. |
| Documentation depth | The README includes Docker, manual installation, configuration, startup, API, testing, and troubleshooting instructions. | The help center contains tutorials, workflow articles, API guidance, export specifications, role documentation and dated release notes. |
| Integrations | The self-hosted setup uses Grobid for document processing, RabbitMQ and Celery for worker processing, and SciBERT through bert-as-a-service. | External records can be imported through RIS or BibTeX files, and Zotero-compatible files can be handled through the Zotero translator. |
| Purpose | RobotReviewer automatically annotates clinical trial PDFs with PICO characteristics and likely bias assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. | Sysrev is a platform for data curation and systematic evidence review. |
| Self-hosting | Users can run the web interface and API locally from the source repository. | SRVC documentation describes local installation using Nix and git-managed review projects, with optional synchronization to Sysrev. |
| Support | The project directs users to an email address for questions and integration assistance. | Users can submit an in-project issue report or email [email protected]. |
RobotReviewer plans
- FreeFree
Sysrev plans
- BasicFree
- Premium$50 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick RobotReviewer if…
RobotReviewer suits people analyzing clinical trial reports who need PICO annotation, likely bias assessments, or synthesis across groups of reports. It may also suit teams able to manage its self-hosted setup requirements.
Pick Sysrev if…
Sysrev suits researchers conducting systematic, scoping, or rapid reviews, including collaborative institutional teams. It may fit projects that need flexible record import, screening, and structured data extraction.