ReviQ
5.6#28 in systematic review softwareWebSelf-hosted
VisitReviQ vs RevMan
What both publish
| Fact | ReviQ | RevMan |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | Reviewers can exchange decisions as JSON files, and grey-literature corpora can be shared through an interchange package. | Authors can edit different review fields concurrently and see which collaborators are currently working in a review. |
| Integrations | Grey-literature retrieval can use SearchApi.io-backed search engines or arXiv’s API, and uses ScrapingBee to fetch and archive sources. | RevMan can import study data and references from Covidence, and RIS reference imports can use data from Crossref, PubMed, or CRS. |
| Intended users | The project describes its workflow for researchers conducting systematic or multivocal literature reviews, including reviews with up to five reviewers. | RevMan supports diagnostic test accuracy, intervention, methodology, overview, prognosis, qualitative, and flexible review types. |
| Purpose | ReviQ is a locally deployed workbench for systematic and multivocal literature reviews. | RevMan is Cochrane’s software for producing transparent systematic reviews, guiding authors from structured data entry and analysis through result visualization. |
ReviQ plans
No prices published.
RevMan plans
- Practice reviewFree
- Cochrane author accessFree
- Individual student annual subscription£80 a year
- Student£80 a year
- Academic£100 a year
- Individual academic annual subscription£100 a year
Pick ReviQ if…
ReviQ is intended for researchers conducting systematic or multivocal literature reviews. It may suit teams of up to five reviewers comfortable with Docker and local deployment.
Pick RevMan if…
RevMan suits authors preparing systematic reviews across its listed review types, including people working collaboratively on analysis and writing. The free practice option may suit someone who can work within its deletion, export, and single-user limits.