EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Qualflare vs Tesults

Qualflare logo

Qualflare

8.2#2 in test flakiness management softwareFrom $16 a month
Free planAndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit
Tesults logo

Tesults

7.3#10 in test analytics softwareFrom $19 a month
Free planAndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactQualflareTesults
Framework supportThe Qualflare CLI parses and uploads results from 23 testing frameworks, including JUnit, pytest, Jest, Playwright, Cypress, Newman, k6, and security tools.The site lists integrations for frameworks including JUnit, pytest, Jest, Playwright, Cypress, Postman, GoogleTest and ROS 2.
HeadquartersTallinn, EstoniaLondon, England, UK
IntegrationsOfficial integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, Slack, Discord, Jira, and webhooks.The site lists GitHub Actions, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Mattermost, PagerDuty and Jira integrations.
ProductQualflare is an AI-powered test management and observability platform that collects CI results, clusters failures, detects flaky tests, and scores release risk.Tesults consolidates automated test reporting and test case management for engineering teams.
SecurityQualflare states that it uses TLS 1.2+ in transit, AES-256 at rest, role-based access control, mandatory SSO and MFA for staff, and immutable employee-access audit logs.The service stores data in US data centers on AWS, encrypts communication with TLS over HTTPS, and encrypts authentication-related data at rest.

Qualflare plans

  • Open source planFree
  • StarterFree
  • Core$16 a month
  • Scale$48 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Tesults plans

  • FreeFree
  • Standard$19 a month
  • Plus$37 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick Qualflare if…

Qualflare suits software teams coordinating manual and automated test management across supported frameworks and CI/CD workflows. It can also fit teams that need failure analysis or mobile test-result ingestion without running mobile tests through the platform.

Pick Tesults if…

Tesults suits engineering teams managing automated results alongside manual QA cases. Teams that need mobile dashboard access or run comparisons may also find its listed tools relevant.

Charts they share